Recently, a woman came into my office saying that she had a question she needed to ask me. She had a Bible in her hand, and I put what I was doing aside and asked her what was going on? I expected the question to be related to a verse she was having trouble with, or something her pastor said that she was unsettled by. These things happen often at the shelter. But when I asked her what her question was, she set her bible down on my desk and said that she didn’t understand how both the Bible and science could be true. If science is right, doesn’t that mean we don’t need the Bible anymore? Aren’t its claims out dated and unnecessary in this day and age? Her question is not unique. It is echoed throughout our culture. College professors proclaim it, Atheist authors make millions on it, and fundamentalist preachers even fuel it, denouncing science as today’s heresy. But is this a legitimate controversy? Are science and scripture at odds? Does one have to brush aside physics and fear geology to love the Lord? The truth is, not at all! But you have to have your foundation right!
Today, many popular skeptics tend toward “scientism”. That is to say, they believe that science and only science is the source of knowledge. Science is THE way that we know ANYTHING. Science, therefore, is there foundation. But this, first of all, is self refuting. You cannot prove that “science is the only source of knowledge” scientifically. What experiment did you do to arrive at that statement? What observation let to that law? None. It is an assumption that is itself NOT scientific. Science itself does not set itself up as the only way to know anything. In fact, Science assumes certain things to be true before it even starts. It assumes that the universe is consistent. It assumes that our senses are basically accurate. It assumes that our memory is essentially reliable, so that what we think we observed moments ago is in fact what we really did observe. These things cannot be scientifically proven, and if they are not true, science is impossible. Now, we would all agree that these are perfectly rational assumptions, but that is the point! These are things we all “know” to be true, but no science can PROVE them! Science, in fact, needs us to already KNOW them, because if you doubt them, then observation and experiment mean nothing. These are clear examples of things we know without science.
Now, what kind of world allows these things to be true? If we are only matter in motion, and are nothing more than chemicals and particle collisions, as the scientific atheist must affirm, then why should I believe my senses tell me anything that is actually TRUE about the universe. If I am nothing more than a highly evolved animal, shaped by only blind physical process based on survival and reproduction, then my senses would tell me whatever they needed to for me to survive and procreate. An illusion that makes me avoid death and find a mate would be just as beneficial as actual perception of reality, if not more so! Why should an atheistic evolutionist believe that a randomly evolved replicating chemical system can actually “know” anything at all about what the universe really is? Now, what about the Biblical view? If there is an intelligent and orderly God governing the universe, we should expect it to be consistent. If he created man in his image, and desires him to know truth and live right, we should expect senses that tell us truth about the universe and memory that can help us retain and know it. All the assumptions science needs to work in the first place fit best in a Biblical world view. The Bible gives us the reasons to believe that science works at all, where as atheism does not. The Bible makes sense out of the things that we all rely on everyday, and it makes sense out of science itself!
Also, remember that science has a limited scope. Science, for example, answers “how” questions, it does not answer “why” questions. This is not a weakness of science, just an explanation of sciences purpose. A hammer is a wonderful tool I can use to do many things, but I would not use it to cook an egg or change the channel on my TV. That is simply not what a hammer is for. Science is similar. It is a wonderful tool to know certain types of information, but people run into trouble when they try to use it for things it simply can’t do. Science cannot answer questions of purpose or morality. It does not explain spiritual matters, nor can it be applied to prove that spiritual matters do or do not exist. It is confined to physical observations, and as such, can only explain what happens, and can only do so in the physical domain. It cannot tell us why a physical world exists in the first place. Scientist have tried to use it this way, and have failed. It cannot tell us what is right or wrong. It cannot tell us who God is, or what He wants from us, and thus it cannot tell us WHY we exist or what the PURPOSE of life is. Science is an amazing tool, one that we should love and embrace, using the minds God has given us to be productive, help others, and explore the wonderful world God has given us. But we need to remember that it is a precision tool, not an all purpose one.
Finally, like archeology, in recent years there have been quite a few in the academic realm that have found science to push them TOWARD Christian faith rather than away from it. They have looked at the world and realized that God’s fingerprints are indeed on all he made, and that the heavens really do declare the glory of God.
Physicist Robert Jastrow, director of NASA’s “Goddard Institute for Space Studies” (though himself an agnostic) said it well when he painted this picture:
“For the scientist that has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance. He is about to conquer the highest peak. As he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”
- Luke
jude.three.blog@gmail.com